.png)
October 19, 2026
|
5 min read
Opus vs Sonnet vs Haiku: A Cost-vs-Capability Routing Guide
By أشيش دوبي
Published: October 19, 2026
Built for Speed: ~10ms Latency, Even Under Load
Blazingly fast way to build, track and deploy your models!
- Handles 350+ RPS on just 1 vCPU — no tuning needed
- Production-ready with full enterprise support
TrueFoundry AI Gateway delivers ~3–4 ms latency, handles 350+ RPS on 1 vCPU, scales horizontally with ease, and is production-ready, while LiteLLM suffers from high latency, struggles beyond moderate RPS, lacks built-in scaling, and is best for light or prototype workloads.
Built for Speed: ~10ms Latency, Even Under Load
Try now.
Start free
How Can You Prevent GenAI Costs From Spiraling at Scale?
Gartner Hype Cycle for Platform Engineering 2026
One Layer of Control for All AI
Discover More
No items found.
.png)
.png)
No items found.
Recent Blogs
.png)
.png)
.png)
.png)
.png)
.png)
.png)
.png)
.png)
.png)
Frequently asked questions
What’s the difference between Opus, Sonnet, and Haiku?
They are Claude tiers trading capability for price. Haiku 5.5 is the fastest and cheapest for high-volume tasks; Sonnet 5.5 balances speed and intelligence; Opus 5.5 is the recommended default for most workloads. Fable 5.1 sits above them for the most demanding reasoning. All share a 1M-token context window.
Which Claude model is cheapest?
Haiku 5.5, starting around $0.10 input / $0.50 output per million tokens as of October 2026. Fable 5.1 is the most expensive at $10 / $50. Confirm current rates on Anthropic’s pricing page.
Should I just use the most capable model everywhere?
Usually not — most requests don’t need it, and the price spread from Haiku to Fable is roughly 100x. Route easy, high-volume work to cheaper tiers and reserve the top tiers for hard tasks.
How do I route by task without rewriting my app?
Point the app at a logical model name backed by a tier, or use a gateway’s automatic routing to score each request and pick a tier. The application calls one endpoint; the routing lives in configuration.
Does a bigger context window mean a better model?
Not here — all four tiers share the same 1M-token window. Choose on reasoning depth and latency, not context size.
